Wednesday, August 08, 2012

Fifty Shades of Grey, by E. L. James

When I caught the SNL bit on this popular erotic read this past spring, I had to turn to the internet to figure out what it even was.  Yah, I'm aware that I take "living under a rock" to a whole new level.  I skimmed an article or two and promptly decided that I was not in the least bit interested in reading porn.  In true Julia style, I was feeling mighty meh about hopping onto this bandwagon.

On Monday night, a copy of the nefarious Fifty Shades of Grey materialized from Soeur's bag.  I smirked, mildly amused that a copy of this wanton book had somehow landed in my home.  Of course she'd have a copy.  You should read it.  Not great, but keeps you turning enough pages to keep you awake on the red-eye was the gist of her feedback.



I had heard that Fifty had outsold the final Harry Potter book.  Let's face it: that's impressive.  Outstanding, even.  So that very night, I opened my mind and had a go.  I whipped through the first two hundred pages.  Not much happened, but it held my interest enough that I picked it up again last night.  A few pages in, I got stuck.  I could not, for the life of me, move past page 231.  That page starts a chapter with a disturbing description of the protagonist naked and shackled to a bed.  Spread eagle.  There was also some mention of leather in there.  Maybe a whip?  Or a belt?  I don't remember.  All I know is that the visual images forming in my head were gravely stressing me out.  I could not get my eyes to read through the sentences, no less finish the paragraph.  I closed the book and removed it from my bedstand to the living area.  I could not have it near me.

Utterly baffled doesn't even begin to cover it.  Why do people want to read about a woman tied down to a bed and whipped?  Isn't that the least arousing and most frightening thing imaginable?  How did this outsell the last Harry Potter book?  The world of sadomasochism eludes me.  Psychologically, it seems seriously unhealthy.  Damaging.  Not good for the soul, mind, or body.  Surely, I must be missing something here.  Why do I find this so vile and disturbing while millions of readers are making this book a bestseller?  And now there are plans for a blockbuster film.  Wha?

Stranger things have happened than a ridiculously successful erotic book trilogy about two beautiful people like Christian Grey and Anastasia Steele.  That's not new.  But it is extremely unsettling to know that this book has been so well-received globally - as in, translated-into-several-dozen-languages globally.  Human beings are strange creatures.  I guess as hard as I may try to understand and accept, mass behaviors will never cease to surprise me.  What I do know is that halfway through page 231 of book one of three is probably as far as I'll make it on this bandwagon.

7 comments:

  1. You got further on the bandwagon than I did. I requested it from the library, but ended up canceling the hold. I cannot bring myself to read about sex in that fashion. The red hot read in Cosmo is enough for me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I wish I knew someone who understood this stuff better than me. Maybe then they could explain it to me in a way that I'd "get" it. Or maybe that would backfire and I wouldn't be able to be their friend anymore. Eek. Maybe it's better that I just stay clueless.

      Did you see the Times Magazine article on Cosmo's editor-in-chief this past weekend? That is one powerful lady!

      Delete
  2. I hear you. What is the message sent to young women? That you need a man to pay you, whip you, and be dominant over you to have a 'lover'? That is what got to me. I call it "Fifty Shades of Crazy". Not sure what page I got to. All I know is this is not "reading" to me, and it's insulting to call this a "book".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Didn't even think about how this popularity might impact impressionable young minds - both boys and girls. Hmm. Very good point.

      I guess people derive and experience pleasure in different ways. That's ok. What I'm having difficulty getting past are the mental games involved in S&M. It just seems so...negative. And detrimental. Scarily so. I guess I'll never understand.

      Delete
  3. Yea. The mental games that involve complete INequality--something our ERA sisters worked so hard to get for us. That's what bothers me J. And yes--young men. Rich men. That's all they have to do to get some? Turn on the charm, open the wallet, and provide instant, unlimited humiliation, and women will just give it all up. It's an unacceptable message.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think some, and apparently quite a bit, of women like to be dominated. I'm not sure why, I don't get turned on by that, in fact it kind of pisses me off. I think the book could possibly distort the image or expectation of sex for younger women, as if their love life isn't normal if their partner has no urge to dominate them. I understand and appreciate some role playing but if the mentality of domination leaves the bedroom it sets up an unequal relationship.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm kind of hoping someone will come out of the woodwork and offer some insight. In particular, I'm curious how domination in the bedroom would stay in the bedroom. I'm having trouble seeing how a couple can manage the two as mutually exclusive parts of their relationship.

      Delete